Bot vs firm verdict

Grid Master 3000 vs prop firms, which actually pass?

Representative grid-trading EA, one of the most-sold strategy types on MQL5; known for catastrophic drawdowns.

0 of 5 testable firms passedforexVendor: MQL5 marketplace (commercial; multiple variants)Last verified: 2026-05-16

Verdict matrix

Firm-by-firm: passes, busts, or untested.

Trailing 5% DD floor incompatible with grid drawdown profile, any meaningful adverse run busts the account.

Static 10% DD looks generous but grid bots routinely produce >10% drawdowns when the underlying trend persists against the grid.

MyForexFundsUntested

Pending relaunch.

Trailing $2,500 DD on $50K = 5%, grid bots bust this routinely on trending markets.

1% daily loss limit and 4% static DD are nowhere near wide enough for grid drawdown profile.

Same trailing-DD floor as the other trailing-DD products. Grid bots are categorically incompatible with prop-firm rules.

About Grid Master 3000

The strategy in plain English.

Grid bots open new positions at regular price intervals against the trend, averaging down on losers in the hope of recovering on a reversal. They look profitable on short backtests because the equity curve climbs slowly and steadily, until it doesn't, at which point the cumulative position size produces a near-100% account drawdown. Prop firms hate grid bots because the drawdown profile is asymmetric: small wins, occasional catastrophic loss. We include this entry as a cautionary example, not a recommendation.

Track-record source we replayed: https://www.mql5.com/en/market

How we verified this

Where the Grid Master 3000 verdict comes from.

Authored and reviewed by Ryan Tran, Strategy Lead, Glitch Executor. Ryan owns the firm-rule engine that produced every verdict on this page.

  • The replayed track record is publicly traceable: https://www.mql5.com/en/market
  • No paid placements, we do not accept money to include or rank a strategy here.
  • Verdicts re-run every quarter against the current firm rule set. Last verified: .
  • Glitch Executor is tooling, not a managed-account or signal vendor. Use this page to inform your own pre-flight, not as a recommendation to trade Grid Master 3000.

FAQ

Common questions about Grid Master 3000 and prop firms.

Which prop firms does Grid Master 3000 pass?

Grid Master 3000 does not pass any of the 5 testable firms in the current audit. The verdict matrix above explains the specific rule each firm enforces that the strategy can't survive.

What is the biggest rule risk for Grid Master 3000?

On FundingPips Zero, Trailing 5% DD floor incompatible with grid drawdown profile, any meaningful adverse run busts the account. Hard failures (rule breaches) usually come from drawdown rules, both daily-loss and trailing/static, interacting with how the strategy concentrates risk per trade.

Where does the data behind this verdict come from?

We replayed Grid Master 3000's publicly-traceable track record (https://www.mql5.com/en/market) through the same firm-rule engine that powers Glitch Executor's backtest verdicts and live breach detection. No paid placements; verdicts are reproducible from public data.

Can I run Grid Master 3000 on a Glitch Executor account?

Glitch Executor is tooling for tracking and pre-flighting strategies, not a signal vendor or marketplace. You can upload your own MT5 statement or Myfxbook CSV into the Library to get the same per-firm verdict for your real trading history, including Grid Master 3000 if you have your own track record.

When is this verdict next re-verified?

Verdicts are re-replayed during the quarterly firm-rule audit. This page's verdict was last verified on 2026-05-16. Firm-rule changes flagged by the public pricing watcher trigger an out-of-cycle update when they invalidate a verdict.

Pre-flight your own strategy. Free to try.

Upload an MT5 statement or Myfxbook CSV, get the same per-firm verdict for your real trading history. File stays in your browser.