Bot vs firm verdict

Volatility Mean-Reversion cBot vs prop firms, which actually pass?

Mean-reversion on Bollinger-band extremes for major forex pairs, slow, low-frequency, low-drawdown.

2 of 4 testable firms passedforexVendor: cTrader Algo community (open-source)Last verified: 2026-05-16

Verdict matrix

Firm-by-firm: passes, busts, or untested.

Drawdown profile is friendly to the 5% trailing DD. The 7-profitable-days quota in 30 is the bottleneck, typical months produce only 4-6 active days.

Plenty of headroom inside the 5% daily / 10% static DD. Hitting 10% target in a single 30-day window depends on volatility regime.

MyForexFundsUntested

Pending relaunch.

Apex is futures; cBot is cTrader. Not a meaningful matchup.

3-profitable-days quota at ≥0.5% per session is achievable but requires deliberately concentrating size on signal days, which conflicts with the small R-multiple design.

No min-days requirement removes the consistency bottleneck. 6% trailing DD compatible with the small drawdown profile.

About Volatility Mean-Reversion cBot

The strategy in plain English.

A canonical mean-reversion strategy: trade when price stretches >2 standard deviations from a 20-period moving average, exit on return to the mean. Win-rate is high (~70%), R-multiple is small (~0.5R), and the strategy is dormant most of the time. The combination produces a low-drawdown equity curve that fits most prop firms, but the dormancy is a problem for firms that enforce min-profitable-days quotas.

Track-record source we replayed: https://ctrader.com/algos

How we verified this

Where the Volatility Mean-Reversion cBot verdict comes from.

Authored and reviewed by Ryan Tran, Strategy Lead, Glitch Executor. Ryan owns the firm-rule engine that produced every verdict on this page.

  • The replayed track record is publicly traceable: https://ctrader.com/algos
  • No paid placements, we do not accept money to include or rank a strategy here.
  • Verdicts re-run every quarter against the current firm rule set. Last verified: .
  • Glitch Executor is tooling, not a managed-account or signal vendor. Use this page to inform your own pre-flight, not as a recommendation to trade Volatility Mean-Reversion cBot.

FAQ

Common questions about Volatility Mean-Reversion cBot and prop firms.

Which prop firms does Volatility Mean-Reversion cBot pass?

Volatility Mean-Reversion cBot passes 2 of 4 testable firms in the current audit: FTMO Phase 1, GetLeveraged Turbo. The verdict matrix above shows the full per-firm breakdown including soft failures and untested matchups.

What is the biggest rule risk for Volatility Mean-Reversion cBot?

No hard rule breaches in the latest audit. Soft failures (missing profit target or profitable-day quotas) are the remaining risk; see the verdict matrix.

Where does the data behind this verdict come from?

We replayed Volatility Mean-Reversion cBot's publicly-traceable track record (https://ctrader.com/algos) through the same firm-rule engine that powers Glitch Executor's backtest verdicts and live breach detection. No paid placements; verdicts are reproducible from public data.

Can I run Volatility Mean-Reversion cBot on a Glitch Executor account?

Glitch Executor is tooling for tracking and pre-flighting strategies, not a signal vendor or marketplace. You can upload your own MT5 statement or Myfxbook CSV into the Library to get the same per-firm verdict for your real trading history, including Volatility Mean-Reversion cBot if you have your own track record.

When is this verdict next re-verified?

Verdicts are re-replayed during the quarterly firm-rule audit. This page's verdict was last verified on 2026-05-16. Firm-rule changes flagged by the public pricing watcher trigger an out-of-cycle update when they invalidate a verdict.

Pre-flight your own strategy. Free to try.

Upload an MT5 statement or Myfxbook CSV, get the same per-firm verdict for your real trading history. File stays in your browser.